Showing posts with label Book Reviews. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Book Reviews. Show all posts

Monday, October 26, 2009

Why I Don't Read the Twilight Series


I love to read. I always have. Usually, when a popular series comes out, I'm curious enough to at least check it out at the library. After all, regardless of whether it's my favorite genre or not, if it's good enough to get national attention, I figure I can at least learn something as a writer.

However, I was extremely skeptical about Stephanie Meyer's Twilight series. Call me crazy, but there didn't really seem anything too appealing to me about reading a teen "romance" novel if you can even call it that, since the guy is a vampire. Working on a master's degree gave me plenty of reading material, so I put reading the teen saga on hold.

Then, it seemed like the Twilight phenomenon exploded in my life. Tons of the women in our church's young adults ministry were reading them. My hairdresser gushed about them. This was expanding way beyond the tween market!

My breaking point happened when one of the guys in the college ministry put up a Facebook status that said, "[His name] is better than Edward Cullen." Girls came out of the woodworks to comment. Most of the responses were outright violent! How dare him EVEN think that he could ever be better than their precious Edward!

"He's a fictional character!" I thought. "Don't these girls understand how ridiculous they sound?"

That was enough to convince me I needed to see what the big fuss was all about.

Just a few chapters in, I realized why every girl who read these books was head over heels in love with Edward Cullen.

He's perfect...if you can overlook that whole vampire thing.

He's tall, dark and handsome. (His skin even sparkles in the sunlight!) He's mysterious. He's always the at the right place at the right time. He's a good guy. He refuses to pressure Bella sexually. In fact, he turns down her advances. And the best part? His one-liners.

"I dream about being with you forever."

"Look after my heart. I've left it with you."

"Do you really have any idea how important you are to me? Any concept at all of how much I love you?"


If you prefer poetic imagery, how about this?

"Before you, Bella, my life was like a moonless night. Very dark, but there were stars - points of light and reason...And then you shot across my sky like a meteor. Suddenly everything was on fire; there was brilliancy, there was beauty. When you were gone, when the meteor had fallen over the horizon, everything went black. Nothing had changed, but my eyes were blinded by the light. I couldn't see the stars anymore. And there was no more reason for anything."

After reading that phrase, I thought, "Come on, James. Why can't you ever say something like that?!"

And that was when I realized I had to put the book down.

I'm not going to go so far to say that all men are wired one way and all woman are wired another way. There may be some women out there who could read this without becoming personally involved in the story. But I know myself, and I know that this book is dangerous territory for me.

Why? Because I am most attracted to sensuality and emotionally-filled words.

For women who think like me, allow me to flip flop the situation for you.

Let's say your husband is like mine, meaning he would choose sexuality over sensuality, and if he had to choose between seeing you and hearing you, he would always prefer to be able to look at you. Knowing this about him, would you say that it's perfectly safe for him to watch pornography? What about a simple sex scene in a movie with a female actress that you know he thinks is extremely attractive?

No way.

My husband and I both made "True Love Waits" commitments in middle school, meaning that we vowed we would not have sex until we were married. For 23 years, I heard women talk about how "sex isn't like they show it on TV." Now that I'm married, I know they're right...and to be honest, it really frustrates me.

Here's the bottom line. It's the media's job is to attract viewers. What better way to ensure that you have a captivated audience than show men exactly what they want to see?

They show the woman engrossed in a one night stand, but they don't show her regret the next day...or the fact that she struggles with trusting people for the rest of her life. They show the female as the pursuer in the bedroom, but they don't show the insecurity she feels inside. I won't go into details here, but they show how sex is picture perfect and passion-filled from the beginning...when in reality, the only way to make sex enjoyable is to have it with one person and learn from one another over time. They show the couple having sex multiple times a day...when let's be honest - if you have jobs and responsibilities, most couples are doing pretty good if they average a couple of times a week.

Because of the way sex is often portrayed in the media, not even including pornography, it sets unclear expectations on women from their spouses. Even for couples who wait like my husband and I did, at the beginning, sex was nothing like he expected. The media had put unclear expectations in his head of what the "ideal sex life" was like.

It makes me angry that the media can fill our heads with these lies. Trust me. Marriage is a blessing, but it takes work. Additional complications are not neccessary! Putting wives on TV who wake up in the morning looking as perfect as they did before they washed their makeup off, who work full-time, start dinner and give their husband "dessert" on a nightly basis is just not realistic!

It's just as unrealistic as expecting my husband to know exactly what to say to take my breath away each time he opens his mouth.

As I've already pointed out, Edward Cullen isn't real. He's a fictional character...and a fictional character CREATED BY A WOMAN at that. Of course he knows to say exactly what every woman wants to hear. A woman wrote the book!

Again, I'm not saying that this should be the rule of thumb for every woman. I'm just suggesting...if you are inclined to think like I am, reverse the situation:

Would you want your husband to subject himself to any material that could possibly put unrealistic expectations in his head of how you were supposed to behave? My answer is no, so that is why I realize that I don't need to read things like this book.

Now, I didn't finish the book, so I can't give a full report of this, but I do want to make a few brief comments on the character of Bella. As soon as she discovers Edward is a vampire, she is so intrigued by his life that she becomes disgusted with her own humanity. Very quickly, Bella becomes willing to throw away her values, family and friends for a guy she barely knows...and what she does know of him is pretty dangerous.

My pointis not that idenitifying with character of Bella could cause a woman to desire to fall in with a vampire. However, especially by means of social media, it's easy for grown men to have access to young girls and lure them away from home...just by saying (or typing) the right words. Idolizing a character who desires to exchange her created purpose for another life, disobeys her parents and devalues herself is just not the role model I would want my daughter to have.

I don't think you are a bad person if you read this book or if you let your daughter read it. These are simply my own personal convictions and precautions. Sure, there's a chance that I could read this entire series, enjoy it and never put unrealistic expectations on my husband.

But my marriage is too valuable to me to take that chance.

Friday, February 27, 2009

McChurch: Is Today's Christianity Like A Happy Meal?



Fast food chains thrive because of the drive-through window. Customers pull in, order what they want and leave virtually unchanged. In Franchising McChurch: Feeding Our Obsession with Easy Christianity, authors Thomas White and John Mark Yeats question some churches today that are catering to the drive-through mindset.

Though many seem to have categorized the book as targeting the multisite movement, the intent of the book is to address consumer-driven Christianity, White and Yeats said during a forum for the seminary’s Student Theological Fellowship on Thursday, Feb. 26. They discussed how McDonaldization of the church has resulted in an efficient, “boxed-in” faith that may or may not leave room for the spirit of God to move.

Without questioning evangelistic motives, they asked whether some of the various means of efficiency, such as multiple services, sites or worship styles, are wise. Rather than just going with what works, Yeats said, “There are limits to what we should be able to do because what Scripture gives us are limits.”

Rather than looking for something that works, White pointed out, church leaders should be asking, “Does this glorify God?” He said, “Yes, we want people to be saved. Yes, we want to be evangelistic. But we don’t want to take down so many barriers that we take down the cross.”

White encouraged church leaders to follow the unselfish example of Christ described in Philippians 2, considering God’s Kingdom as a whole, and to re-examine “pure religion” that James wrote about. Therefore, genuine life change should be the measure of success, not numbers.

Future implications for the McChurch are unknown. White ended the discussion with a question: “Will the franchised church of today result in disenfranchised religious people of tomorrow?” Is efficiency really worth the risk?

Through the pages of this book, you will be challenged to evaluate not only today's church, but your personal motivation when you walk through the doors yourself. Are you attending a church because of what you get from it or because of what you can give to it?

You can listen to the complete audio of the forum here: http://www.swbts.edu/mediaresources/

You can buy the book online here: http://www.amazon.com/Franchising-Mcchurch-Feeding-Obsession-Christianity/dp/1434700046

One final thought: As I listened to this discussion, I couldn't help drawing a comparison in my mind. Have you ever given a child a gift only to find that they are much more entertained by the box that it came in?

I wonder if in a way, we have done the same thing with the gift that God has given us: church. He intended for us to establish true community with one another - corporate worship, true teaching from His Word, fellowship, and accountability. Just as we are frustrated with the child who is more concerned with popping every bubble on the bubble wrap than the actual present, how much more would God be heart-broken watching His children argue over how to "package" church, who gets to wrap it, or whether the gift needs to be exchanged for something that really "works..."